PROGRAMS:     Energy Farms Network     Global Public Media     Oil Depletion Protocol     Post Carbon Cities     Relocalization Network     Solar Car Share    

Q12. What else did Lomborg get wrong about polar bears?

Over at Grist, Joseph Romm has also been sniffing around Lomborg’s polar bear chapter. Like Daniel Berger at Salon (see Question 11), Romm has also done his homework, reeling off study after study that make mincemeat of Lomborg’s claim. (“Debunking Bjorn Lomborg: Part 1: The great polar bear irony,” September 18, 2007). For example, Romm cites a recent U.S. Geological Survey report on the state of polar bears, which concludes:

“Projected changes in future sea ice conditions, if realized, will result in loss of approximately 2/3 of the world’s current polar bear population by the mid 21st century. Because the observed trajectory of Arctic sea ice decline appears to be underestimated by currently available models, this assessment of future polar bear status may be conservative.”

You can read more of Romm's coverage of polar bears, global warming, and Lomborg here and here.

 

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <span> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <hr>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [view:viewname] tags to display listings of nodes.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question helps us prevent automated spam submissions.