Post Carbon Institute

Skip to content

Reduce Consumption : Produce Locally


The Magic Market

oil price volatilityAs the world finance system disintegrates and the price of oil wafts below $80 a barrel, we are about to see yet another instance of Market Magic.

Demand for oil is falling as world economic activity sputters. Many analysts are now forecasting that the barrel price could go as low as $50 to $60 in the next few weeks.

Meanwhile, however, the marginal cost of bringing a new barrel of oil into production has been rising in recent years, and now stands in the range of $80 to $100. Therefore, as the spot price and futures prices weaken, efforts to develop new oil sources will be mothballed.

At the same time, some recent adaptive efforts to develop renewable energy and energy efficiency, spurred by $150 oil, are getting slammed by lower oil prices and the drying up of investment capital.

Once petroleum supply levels have fallen sufficiently (OPEC is now trying to decide how much production to take off-line), oil prices will start to recover and will eventually soar. But the response this time (by way of investments both in new oil production capacity and alternative energy sources) will be weaker.

Price volatility discourages helpful societal responses.

Markets may be efficient ways of allocating goods and services in “normal” times, but when essential goods become scarce, or the rules of finance get bollixed up, the market can act in ways that are anything but rational.

The only way to navigate the energy transition while avoiding societal collapse is through a planned process that takes charge of the price mechanism in a way that encourages adaptation to the ultimate reality of dwindling supply. Adoption of an Oil Depletion Protocol would be a good first step in that process, followed by massive government support for investment in renewable energy, electric public transit, urban redesign, home insulation, and agricultural transition.

image: world bank

It is always good to read Mr. Heinberg, but regrettably his voice had been crying unheeded for quite sometime now.

Not that his is the only one; a number of others have been playing in this orchestra as well. The unfolding of events is no surprise to those who have been listening. And the others have also proposed remedies that overlap to varying degrees. Many of these are being adopted at local levels.

Mr. Heinberg's approach has included seeking appropriate policies at the highest levels. That is the most effective way to reduce the impact - on the large scale - of coming events. And while those at the helm are reluctant to change course, the failure to do so (two decades ago) may well have the craft run into the reef - or shall we say the Scylla and Charbydis of Peak Oil and Global Warming.

Submitted by Robin Datta (not verified) on October 14, 2008 - 12:11am.

Richard,

can you please mail me any references about the marginal cost, which as you write stands in the range of $80 to $100? I remember to have read about a Goldman Sachs statement, which was even above $100, but I am not sure.
Thanks!

Submitted by joqa (not verified) on October 14, 2008 - 4:43am.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <span> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <hr>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [view:viewname] tags to display listings of nodes.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question helps us prevent automated spam submissions.

 
© 2004-2009 Post Carbon Institute. Post Carbon Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization incorporated in the United States. Login