Post Carbon Institute

Skip to content

PROGRAMS:     Global Public Media     Local Energy Farms     Oil Depletion Protocol     Relocalization Network     Post Carbon Cities    


City planners descend on Las Vegas... and largely ignore energy

Submitted by Daniel Lerch on May 9, 2008 - 4:04pm.

Last Wednesday John Kaufmann, Jennifer Brost-Sarnecki and I held a session on "Responding to Peak Oil and Energy Uncertainty" at the annual American Planning Association conference in Las Vegas -- the only session this year specifically on peak oil, and likely the first ever at this annual conference. (If you attended the session and want to our presentations or get on the mailing list we discussed, click here.)

This is not something I'm happy about. James Howard Kunstler, Richard Heinberg and other scholar-authors sounded the mainstream wake-up call on peak oil over three years ago with books like The Long Emergency and Powerdown, among others. We planners, of all folks, should not have waited until 2008 to get peak oil on the agenda.

Still, better late than never. And judging from the reception we got at our last-of-the-day session (a near-capacity audience, most of whom stayed 45 minutes after the end for Q & A), APA members are starting to recognize that peak oil is a serious, serious issue for us to deal with.

At last year's conference in Philadelphia conference I was encouraged by the trends I saw toward integrating sustainability thinking into conventional planning practice. Last April, however, oil was trading around $60, not $120, and the 'acceptable' level of atmospheric carbon was a reasonable 450 ppm, not a daunting 350 ppm (daunting because we're already at 385 ppm). Things have changed. So this year I went to Las Vegas with a high sense of urgency, and sought to gauge --if only roughly-- two things:

1.) How interested are planners, really, in climate change and energy issues / peak oil?
This year's conference included a special "Energy Planning" track and around 13 climate / energy sessions (out of over 250 total) -- up from a small handful last year, and few if any the year before. I and others noted that many of those session rooms weren't exactly bursting at the seams, and more than one speaker noted that climate and energy should not just be a "special interest" but rather the overriding theme of the conference. They're right: we are nearly out of time on peak oil, and if we're really going to achieve the carbon reductions called for by James Hansen, George Monbiot and others, we have no time to lose.
Planners do seem to be increasingly interested in climate and energy, but not to the degree that's truly needed.
2) Are the big planning firms and agencies starting to address energy uncertainty / peak oil in their work?
To answer this one I did a rather unscientific poll of the folks staffing tables in the exhibit hall for big names like Parsons Brinkerhoff and FEMA, figuring I could get a rough sense of whether an organization was thinking at all about energy uncertainty by how informed or clueless an answer I got.
I certainly got my share of disappointing answers (sorry folks, 1990s-style low-density transit-oriented development is not going to cut it in a world of $250/barrel oil), but there were some bright spots -- most notably a project manager for WRT who's rewriting a Pennsylvania county's Comprehensive Plan with energy efficiency as its main theme, and a manager with FEMA's Mitigation Division who was fully on board with peak oil and wanting to integrate energy uncertainty into her work.
So are the big players really integrating global warming and peak oil into their work? I won't say "no" based on two hours in the APA Exhibit Hall, but I think it's safe to say that energy and climate uncertainty are inching their ways onto the radar screen but have a long way to go.

Disappointing, to be sure. Indeed, the whole conference was somewhat discouraging to me: a massive missed opportunity to address sustainable community planning in this most unsustainable of cities. Not only was there not a single session on what was wrong with Las Vegas (and there is plenty to be learned from, there), the closing speaker, New York Times architecture critic Paul Goldberger, largely focused on how Las Vegas was an extreme extension of American anti-urbanism (per Venturi et al's groundbreaking 1972 book Learning from Las Vegas) that nevertheless has become 'accidentally urban' thanks to the massive pedestrian traffic the Strip generates. Well, the urban designer in me finds that interesting. But we're in a sorry state when thousands of planners come to Las Vegas and the focus is on architectural philosophy -- and not on the fundamental incompatibility of that sprawling city's economic, land use and transportation patterns with the increasingly uncertain flows of natural and human capital it depends on for survival.

In other words: We've got nearly 2 million people living out here in the middle of the desert; they're extremely dependent on distant and declining water sources; their economy absolutely depends on cheap aviation fuel, which will soon be a distant memory; their food, manufactured goods and construction material are all trucked and trained in thousands of miles with cheap diesel fuel, which also isn't getting any cheaper... Maybe this is something planners should be concerned about?

No, at the APA conference, as in planning offices around the country, I'm afraid it's still largely business as usual. I caught the tail end of a session on John Kasarda's 'aerotroplis' concept, which basically promotes public investment in airport-related development clustered around expanded airports. (This is exactly the kind of concept that Hamilton, Ontario abruptly reconsidered after a study pointed out that the air travel and freight sector will have a hard time expanding given a future of depleting oil reserves.) After the session was over, I asked a fellow on his way out if the speakers had discussed energy. He said "No. Absolutely not."

Disappointing, but not surprising.

 


For folks who attended our session at APA:

I promised the audience at our "Responding to Peak Oil and Energy Uncertainty" session that we'd post our slideshows:

- Daniel Lerch, Post Carbon Institute:
PCC_April2008_presentation.ppt (8MB .pdf)
My slideshow was just the first half of this 45-minute show I used in Ireland and the UK earlier in April.

- John Kaufmann, Oregon Department of Energy:
JKaufmann_POTF-American_Planning_Assoc_May08.pdf (1.6MB .pdf)

- Jennifer Brost-Sarnecki, Southern California Association of Governments:
SCAGAPAEnergypresentation.pdf (12MB .pdf)

I also announced --in response to a suggestion by an audience member-- that I'd set up a mailing list for people to continue the discussion about advancing the peak oil message within the APA. I've done so and have added to it the people who gave me their cards after the presentation. If you'd like to be on this list as well and you're an APA member, please contact me with your email address, name, title, affiliation, and APA member number and we'll add you to the list. Please put the words "SCP list" in the title of the message -- I get a lot of email!

Check out this US Carbon Footprint Map, an interactive United States Carbon Footprint Map, illustrating Greenest States. This site has all sorts of stats on individual State energy consumptions, demographics and State energy offices.

http://www.eredux.com/states/

Submitted by eredux on May 13, 2008 - 5:30am.

© 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Post Carbon Institute

Post Carbon Institute is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization incorporated in the United States.